Commentary/ Fuzail Jafferey
From euphony to a noise
There is nothing new about the controversy over the use of microphones
for giving the azaan, or the Muslims's call to prayer.
Time and again, people in different parts of India, have objected
to the use of microphones for azaan. But most state governments
have evaded taking a stand on the issue, not wanting to displease
Muslim citizens, already hypersensitive about religious matters.
A ban on using electronic methods to amplify the azaan
would most definitely be interpreted as yet another attack on
Islam, it is generally feared.
Yet the irony is that the first ban on the use of microphone for
giving the azaan was imposed in Calcutta some time ago
by the Communist Party of India-Marxist-led coalition. The party
has been ruling the state of West Bengal, of which Calcutta is
the capital, for nearly two decades and enjoys the massive support
of the Muslim electorate.
Had a similar ban been imposed in a state like Maharashtra or
Rajasthan, the government's action would have been immediately
termed anti-Muslim or even anti-Islam. But the Left Front government
of West Bengal cannot be termed religiously communal by any stretch
of imagination.
Recent Indian history has been witness to dozens of bloody clashes
between religious communities, taking a heavy loss of life and
property, all on very petty issues such as beating of drums in
front of a mosque or the throwing of some coloured water on a
mosque's outer walls.
A little patience on the part of Muslims would have been of great
help in avoiding such uncalled for bloodshed.
If the ban in Calcutta did not spark violent incidents, the credit
goes to the new-found pragmatism of the city's Muslims and their
ulemas (religious leaders) who have of late begun to differentiate
between emotion and reason.
However, despite all the pragmatism, Calcutta's Muslims did not
accept the order in complete passivity.
Twelve Muslim organisations went to the Calcutta high court, challenging
state Home Minister Budhadev Bhattacharya's ban order. They pleaded
that the ban on the use of loudspeakers for azaan was undemocratic
and infringed the religious rights of the minority community.
After a few hearings Justice Bhagbati Prasad Banerjee upheld the
ban. The judge even refused to modify the orders by allowing the
use of microphones for azaans only twice a year on the
occasions of the Eid festivals.
According to the newspaper reports Justice Banerjee has been,
since then, provided with a police escort and a police picket
has been posted at his residence.
Fortunately, no untoward incident has occurred even after two
weeks of the judgement despite the subtle instigation by certain
Congress leaders such as former federal minister Ajit Panja and
the West Bengal Pradesh Congress Committee Minority Cell chief
Idris Ali.
Now how important is the azaan to Muslims.
Namaz (a strict daily five-prayer schedule) is the basic
tenet of Islam and the azaan is an integral part of namaz.
It is obligatory for every believer to proceed to the nearest
mosque as soon as he hears the azaan.
According to the Bukhari, the most authentic compilation
of the Prophet's (peace be upon him) sayings and pronouncements,
"All those who hear the muezzin's cry will testify for him
on the Day of Resurrection."
On another occasion the Prophet (peace be upon him) pronounced
that "The hand of the All-Merciful is on the muezzin's head
until he completes his call to prayers."
The greatest and most respected muezzin in the history of Islam
was Hazrat Bilal, a Negro companion of the Prophet (peace be upon
him). Bilal's azaan, specially for the pre-dawn prayer
would send believers into ecstasy with its magical, melodious,
modulated and absorbing rendition.
From 6 AD till the proliferation of electronic instruments some
decades ago, muezzin's all over the Muslim world were held in
high esteem. Only such people who possessed extremely sweet and
vibrating voice and were specially trained for the holy job were
appointed muezzins.
Their modulated voice was only loud enough to have an intimate
relationship with the faithful and would engage respectability
in its delivery.
Pakistani scholar S N Burney has this to say: "The call for
the morning prayer from a distance, without mechanical aid, carries
the mystic worlds like ocean waves, now soft, now loud, beckoning
Muslims to the path of salvation, treated by their forefathers
with great love and devotion."
In recent times, the basic qualities of Islam such as love for
fellow beings, humility and patience have been replaced by emotional
aggression and ill advised competition in almost every walk of
life.
It is a sad commentary on Muslims, particularly those living on
the Indian sub-continent, that while the numbers of the faithful
visiting mosques has drastically fallen, the number of mosques
continues to increase unabated.
If one Muslims sect has a mosque in a particular locality, other
sects won't lag. The followers of one god and one Prophet (peace
be upon him) insist on having separate mosques for people belonging
to different creeds such as the Hanafi, the Shafai, the Humbli
and the Razakhani.
Today it is possible to find at least half a dozen mosques within
a half kilometre radius. Each mosque, however small, has at least
three to four loudspeakers hooked to an electronic system.
The azaans, coming from different mosques at the same time,
are jumbled in a cacophony and the message is lost. The mystic
words are drowned in a deafening noise. Hoarse, crude sounds in
the name of azaan now disturb the early morning peace of
the sleeping babies, the insomniac old and the sick.
The azaan is supposed to draw people closer to god but
if the muezzin does not have a sweet and modulated voice, his
noise can have the exact opposite effect.
Burney has an ancient anecdote do illustrate the point. Centuries
ago when Islam was still in the process of taking roots among
the primitive society of Arabia, a caravan of Muslims halted near
a settlement of non-believers.
At dawn, the tribal chief of the caravan took upon himself to
give the azaan. Elders advised against it as they had brought
with them a trained muezzin. But the chief insisted and his call
reverberated through the neighbouring villages and settlements.
The caravan had hardly finished praying when they saw a dust storm
closing on them from the direction of the settlement of non-believers.
When it cleared, they saw a group of horsemen. One of them, who
appeared to be their leader, approached the caravan and politely
enquired as to who had called for the prayers.
The caravan pointed out the chief. The leader of the horsemen
took out a bag, full of golden coins, and other precious gifts
and offered them to the chief. Nonplussed, he asked what the occasion
for the gifts was.
The leader of the non-believers answered: "My daughter, old
enough to know her mind, has been insisting on converting to Islam
for a very long time. We had a lot of argument but she would not
listen. And then this morning our gods sent you. When she heard
your call for prayers she gave up the idea of embracing Islam."
Yet another anecdote is about Sheikh Saadi, the great Sufi poet
and scholar from Iran of the medieval age. Acceding to the Shaikh
was a muezzin in the city of Sinjar (now Persia) whose voice was
very unpleasing and annoyed the faithful. One day the chief trustee
of the mosque called him and said: "To the muezzin employed
before you I paid five dinars per month. I will give you ten dinars
every month if you shift elsewhere."
Microphones kill the magic of the muezzin's voice. They cannot
stir the souls of the believers. While the muezzin's modulated
and trained voice provides divine inspiration to listeners, the
blaring of loudspeakers simply irritates.
Amplifiers distort even the most melodious of voices into most
dissonant notes and scare the lives out of many. Moreover, our
watches and alarm clocks and over and above all the fear of god
is the greatest instrument to call us to prayers.
We should not forget that religion should soften our hard lives
and behaviour. Islam very clearly teaches the principles of adjustment
and reconciliation. The amplifier must be replaced by a muezzin
whose voice is pleasant, agreeable and trained so that he can
pronounce the divine word rhythmically and with cleric correctness.
Tell us what you think of this column
|